Embarrassment It became the latest company AI, which issued an in -depth research tool, with a latest function announced on Friday.
Google presented a similar function for the Gemini AI platform in December. Then Opeli launched its own research agent at the starting of this month. All three corporations even gave the same name: deep research.
The goal is to offer more in -depth answers with real quotes for more skilled use cases, in comparison with what you’ll receive from consumer chatbot. IN Blog post By announcing deep research, embarrassment wrote that the function “stands out in many tasks at the level of finance and marketing experts to product research”.
Kuty deep research is currently available on the Internet, and the company said that it can soon be added to the Mac, iOS and Android applications. To use it, simply select “Deep Research” from the drop -down menu after sending the query of embarrassment, which is able to then create a detailed report that might be exported as a PDF file or made available as a page of embarrassment.
In order to create this report, embarrassment said that deep research “iteratively searches, reads documents and reasons for what to provide his research plan because he learns more about thematic areas”, apparently “similar to how a person can examine a new topic, New topic. “
The company also emphasized its results The last exam of humanityAI comparative test with questions at the level of experts in various academic fields. Kutyncy stated that his deep research tool obtained 21.1%in the test, easily beating most other models, comparable to Gemini’s pondering (6.2%), Grok-2 (3.8%) and GPT-4O Openai ( 3.3%)-but not fully suited deep OPENAI (26.6%).
But although you currently need a PRO subscription in the amount of USD 200 per 30 days to make use of deep OPENAI research (the company plans to expand to other levels of subscription), deep embarrassment studies are available for free-non-subscriptions are available to an indefinite number, but a limited variety of limited variety of query Daily, while paying subscribers, they receive unlimited queries.
Deep tendencies also appear to work faster, performing most of the tasks in lower than three minutes in comparison with 5 to half-hour in the case of deep OPENAI research.
Asked to check Various deep research productsThe embarrassment was offered by a review of varied technologies, price models and performance in various cases and items of use, with links to articles with each function). Summed up the differences as follows:
- AI embarrassment is distinguished by speed and availability for unusual researchers
- Openai dominates in analytical depth for corporate applications
- Google integrates the most without any problems with existing performance ecosystems
Although it is too early to know how these tools will affect every day and skilled research, because the economist can be more popular recently illuminated Disadvantages for deep OPENENAI research, which probably also apply here: not only limiting his “creativity” in interpretation of information and tendency to rely on sources that are “easily accessible”, but a greater risk that “outsourcing of all tests to the Supergenius assistant” “Reduce the number of possibilities of having the best ideas.”