Y Combinator claims that the Apple App Store has made the startup development difficult

Y Combinator has he submitted a summary of Amicus In the ongoing legal battle between Apple and Epic Games, arguing that the App Store suppressed startup innovations.

We reached the legal representatives of YC and Apple for comment.

In short, during a long legal dispute. Epic Games filed an antitrust lawsuit for the first time against the manufacturer on the iPhone in 2020. In protest in the Apple protest, it charges 30% of the fee for each purchase made at the App Store, in addition to shopping in the game. Epic stated in his lawsuit that Apple was illegally banned from programmers, telling clients about payment alternatives to the App Store.

The judge ordered Apple to finish his anti -chase policy, but as a substitute the company implemented the link program that allowed programmers to merge with alternative payment methods, and the App Store receives 27% of the fee.

In the next criticism, EPIC accused Apple of violating the court’s order against anti -coagulars, and in April the judge agreed, which meant that Apple would stop imposing restrictions on alternative payment solutions and collecting payments from such methods.

Apple dismisses this decision and subsequently Y Combinator, supporter of epic gamesHe submitted this summary of Amicus in support of epic games. Y Combinator asks the court to reject Apple’s appeal.

“Y Combinator-and a larger Venture Capital community-from the past, they fluctuate before companies based on applications that were weak investments due to Apple tax,” wrote Y Combinator in his application. “Participation in 30% revenues can easily be a difference between a company that can afford scaling, employing new employees and reinvesting in its product, and one that constantly fights for staying on the surface.”

With the current judgment – that Apple must allow programmers to transparently offer alternative payment options – the startup investor wrote: “For the first time in almost two decades, the Combinator may seriously consider investing in innovative companies that in the past would not be possible due to” apple tax “. The Apple tax refers to fees charged by Apple from the APP Store purchases.

Then it was found that Apple was “deep and often insurmountable with the entry barrier, which would suppress with competition and innovation at the source” and that the court should refuse to dismiss Apple and allow anti -chain rule. Another argument will happen on October 21.