On Tuesday, new spac with VC and All-in Podcast Chamath Palhapitiya has turn out to be a public company. Named the lofty name “American exceptional” collected $ 345 million with a mission of acquiring one or more startups in the field of energy, AI, Crypto/DEFI or defense, and then transform these corporations into public entities.
But Palhapitiya wants retail investors to know: he strongly advises you to buy shares, despite the incontrovertible fact that he has reserved a small part-not over 1%-to trade on public markets for retail investors, while 98.7% have already been sold to handmade, large institutions.
“I want to calm the involvement of retail investors in my Space”, he Published on XI later Published Again: “We designed it in this way, almost completely institutionally supported, because, as I found out, these vehicles are not ideal for most retail investors. They are for investors who can guarantee variability, put it within a wider structural portfolio and have capital to support the company in the long run.”
This is not typical for someone to launch IPO and then tell people not to buy stocks. He even goes even to give the buyer a warning for every retail investor (as among the fans of the popular All-in-Ind-in), who still wants to ignore his suggestion and buy. “For everyone on the retail market, which still decides to ignore my advice to avoid SPC, you should carefully review our disclosure and make a fully informed decision.”
The reason for these warnings is a bit funny. Palhapitiya practically caused the creation of spacs in the years 2019–2021, awarding him the title “SPAC King”. It happened after his first SPAC, Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings (IPOA), collected $ 600 million and accepted Virgin Galactic in 2019.
But in a few years this number showed that although spac may be lucrative for sponsors of spacs, reminiscent of Palhapitiya, and sometimes for the acquired startup, rarely earn investors. Or as Yale Journal on regulation Place it: “Space has been providing poor phrases for many years after joining shareholders.”
Goldman Sachs has even banned his insurance for three years. In June, he abandoned this ban and began working with spacs again, leaving Palhapitiya to publish a survey on X with the query: “Should I start sleeping?”
TechCrunch event
San Francisco
|.
October 27-29 2025
Almost 58,000 people voted and For the most part, he voted not (71%). This is because Palhapitiyi’s achievements weren’t higher. Marketwatch in June compiled Registration about the terrible performance of virtually all his spac, showing that many have fallen by greater than 90% compared to the release date.
This week, introducing this new spac, Palhapitiya still argued that SPAC is good for startups, in addition to their employees and early VC investors.
“The reason for returning is now simple. The imbalance between private and public markets has only expanded,” he wrote on X, citing an even larger variety of unicorns today than in 2019. “Employees often have a wealth of paper that is difficult to transform into liquidity. The first investors believe that it is more difficult for the reinvestment of capital in the next generation start -ups.”
But he also admitted that “they were not all roses.” Hence the warning for retail investors. (Social capital refused to comment.)
He says that he is trying to solve some of the worst critics: that spaces enrich the vehicle sponsors at the expense of everyone.
In the case of “American uniqueness” he says that he structured with payments so that sponsors shares are not grown until the share prices reach 50%, 75%and one hundred pcgrowth. “If the contract is a dog, nobody wins. If he is a winner, we will all win … together,” he wrote.
However, the query stays: with every thing we know in 2025, should the startup resolve on the audience through SPAC, whether it is via Palhapitiya or any sleep? History would indicate: probably not, if they need their actions to work well in the long run.